I'm actually surprised that they didn't put "The Hills" girls on the cover because of the new season. Shocker!
Aw, the cover of the new Us Weekly is adorable
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 TYCP Sha |
|||
|
Posts: 92183 (08/20/2008 11:01 AM) |
|
||
|
Ferris Bueller Youre My Hero |
|||
|
Posts: 2522 (08/20/2008 11:04 AM) |
dawn9476 wrote: Okay, but I think the use of the word "Scandal" has to do with the crap that went down in Bejing. Not saying they won't mention that stuff your taking about, but I don't consider that stuff scandalous. |
||
|
JeterFan |
|||
|
Posts: 18601 (08/20/2008 11:06 AM) |
I don't see how they could bypass two Olympic champions and put on some fake people with a fake t.v. show. Plus, Shawn and Nastia have been getting so much
attention of course US would join in on the coverage.
|
||
|
Firefox Goddess |
|||
|
Posts: 3022 (08/20/2008 11:06 AM) |
Seriously isn't there enough press about these horrible gymnasts?
|
||
 DrtyPopMe |
|||
|
Posts: 37820 (08/20/2008 11:09 AM) |
I want to be Shawn's friend, crazy eyebrows and all.
|
||
|
ThisIsErin |
|||
|
Posts: 4419 (08/20/2008 11:10 AM) Most Likely To Reply '07
|
Some of y'all need to STFU and sit in a corner.
|
||
|
JeterFan |
|||
|
Posts: 18602 (08/20/2008 11:11 AM) |
What there is too much press about are these spoiled, untalented rich kids known for some silly t.v. show that will be an answer to a Trivial Pursuit question by 2010. And I wouldn't call racking in gold and silver medals at the Olympic games as being horrible. |
||
|
doylefan2002 |
|||
|
Posts: 8941 (08/20/2008 11:11 AM) |
I think the only magazine that should have Olympics stuff on the cover is Sports Illustrated. There's already way too much coverage in the regular media
(newspapers, TV, etc.). Not everyone gives a shit about the stupid games.
|
||
|
dawn9476 |
|||
|
Posts: 10862 (08/20/2008 11:11 AM) |
Ferris Bueller Youre My Hero wrote:I am sure the age thing will be mention since that came out early last week. I don't know about the bar stuff and the judging because that may have took place after the article was done and the mag was sent to print. I guess we will see. |
||
|
iLOVEtubas |
|||
|
Posts: 14507 (08/20/2008 11:12 AM) |
YAY! I love the new cover.
|
||
|
green lights 30 |
|||
|
Posts: 17162 (08/20/2008 11:13 AM) |
ThisIsErin wrote: aww, I'm glad you saw this. I kinda posted it for you |
||
|
JeterFan |
|||
|
Posts: 18603 (08/20/2008 11:14 AM) |
I don't understand what the big fuss is about. One week without the US Weekly "regulars" isn't a big deal. All you have to do is turn on any entertainment show or go to any blog and you'll hear every update about the idiots from The Hills or how many men Kate Hudson had in her bed this week. |
||
|
ThisIsErin |
|||
|
Posts: 4423 (08/20/2008 11:15 AM) Most Likely To Reply '07
|
They deserve to be plastered all over magazines along with all the other Olympic athletes. They only get this chance once every 4 years.
|
||
|
JeterFan |
|||
|
Posts: 18604 (08/20/2008 11:18 AM) |
I know. One week to focus on real talent and not on somebody's weight loss or baby bump is a nice change.
|
||
|
SelFish |
|||
|
Posts: 6578 (08/20/2008 11:21 AM) |
It's crazy to me that these girls are actual athletes and not just socialites and no one wants to see them on the cover. They are actually doing something
with their lives.
|
||
|
vivalavix |
|||
|
Posts: 14875 (08/20/2008 11:23 AM) |
doylefan2002 wrote: |
||
|
JeterFan |
|||
|
Posts: 18605 (08/20/2008 11:24 AM) |
It's really a sign of the times. Two girls working hard to fulfill their dreams? Boring! A celebrity having an illegitimate child? A bunch of rich kids on
a t.v. show? Front page news!
|
||
|
ThisIsErin |
|||
|
Posts: 4425 (08/20/2008 11:26 AM) Most Likely To Reply '07
|
vivalavix wrote:DIAF! |
||
|
vivalavix |
|||
|
Posts: 14876 (08/20/2008 11:27 AM) |
Because someone doesn't agree with you?...right.
|
||
|
DrtyPopMe |
|||
|
Posts: 37822 (08/20/2008 11:27 AM) |
Well I think stuff like US Weekly shouldn't even be printed
|
||
Quick Reply
