Playboy does hardcore stuff too.
why is playboy considered classy?
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 FirstStrike |
|||
|
Posts: 1312 (02/04/2008 10:56 AM) |
|
||
 AudaciousAudrey |
|||
|
Posts: 10369 (02/04/2008 10:57 AM) |
FirstStrike wrote: Not in the magazines.
|
||
|
AshleyJ22 |
|||
|
Posts: 14272 (02/04/2008 10:59 AM) Best FanFic Writer '07 |
Who the eff considers Playboy classy?
|
||
|
ImFreakinTired69 |
|||
|
Posts: 32888 (02/04/2008 11:03 AM) |
who reads the articles anyway?
|
||
|
dannie9 |
|||
|
Posts: 915 (02/04/2008 11:04 AM) |
lol whydoes everyone think only guys get playboy?
|
||
|
msstacey1111 |
|||
|
Posts: 4423 (02/04/2008 11:05 AM) |
glamsoda wrote:
|
||
|
FirstStrike |
|||
|
Posts: 1313 (02/04/2008 11:16 AM) |
AudaciousAudrey wrote: Playboy doesn't just do magazines.
|
||
|
AudaciousAudrey |
|||
|
Posts: 10371 (02/04/2008 11:16 AM) |
FirstStrike wrote: I know, but the OP was referring to the magazines. That's why I said "not in the magazines" and not "no they don't."
|
||
|
darling20 |
|||
|
Posts: 4656 (02/04/2008 11:19 AM) |
Morons think Playboy's classy b/c compared to a lot of other nude magz (i.e. Hustler), it's "done in a more tasteful manner" and therefore
not as "trashy." Porn's porn. There's nothing classy about pictures whose intended purpose is to get a guy off.
|
||
|
FirstStrike |
|||
|
Posts: 1314 (02/04/2008 11:20 AM) |
AudaciousAudrey wrote: They show the puss in the magazines too.
|
||
|
AudaciousAudrey |
|||
|
Posts: 10373 (02/04/2008 11:23 AM) |
FirstStrike wrote: Only exterior.
|
||
|
FirstStrike |
|||
|
Posts: 1315 (02/04/2008 11:28 AM) |
AudaciousAudrey wrote: Nope, full-on splayed flesh. I'd post some examples or at least links but I'm at work. Furthermore, girls try to call it "classy" because
they're looking for a justification to get paid $500 for showing their tits and vag but are in denial about it being porn.
|
||
|
AudaciousAudrey |
|||
|
Posts: 10374 (02/04/2008 11:32 AM) |
FirstStrike wrote: Do it anyway.
|
||
|
Chippers Ahoy |
|||
|
Posts: 7352 (02/04/2008 11:48 AM) |
|
||
|
SwanGeese |
|||
|
Posts: 3596 (02/04/2008 11:54 AM) |
glamsoda wrote: It's porn. Playboy's entire existence is about sexual arousal, not art. It may be tame compared to its peers and contain articles, but it still
qualifies. Hell even Penthouse has political articles, but that doesn't make it a less of a fap magazine.
|
||
|
nsyncluver327 |
|||
|
Posts: 3089 (02/04/2008 12:58 PM) |
i wonder how much they get paid
|
||
|
moussemaker |
|||
|
Posts: 9595 (02/04/2008 1:16 PM) |
To me it's not porn if it's not age-restricted.
In my country, everybody can buy Playboy. So it's not porn to me. |
||
|
JeterFan |
|||
|
Posts: 16078 (02/04/2008 1:18 PM) |
Any magazine that shows women's breasts, woo woo and ass all spread out is NOT classy. Just because a horny old rich man says it is doesn't make it so.
It's porn just like all the other ones are. |
||
|
pinkie toe |
|||
|
Posts: 2994 (02/04/2008 1:26 PM) |
I'm not a prude
 Playboy is porn. Maybe mild porn, but porn nonetheless.
|
||
|
jracsh527 |
|||
|
Posts: 1843 (02/04/2008 1:30 PM) |
How much Playboy shows varies pretty greatly based on the model and what she's comfortable with. I've seen some "full-on splayed out flesh"
before, but it's not the norm and not very common. In general, their photospreads are much more tasteful than other magazines. And as someone else noted,
not many celebs do Hustler -- but lots of celebrities have done Playboy. It has a better image.
If you hate porn, obviously you are going to think Playboy is trashy. I don't think porn, by definition, has to be trashy. Playboy does some very lovely, artistic nude shots. And FWIW, some people do read the articles I"ve had a subscription of my own for years, I find the articles to be intelligent and well written -- and
the girls to be beautiful. (and I'm a straight woman )
|
||
Quick Reply
